000 05926cam a2200733Ma 4500
001 ocm45733889
003 OCoLC
005 20200810103850.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 001009s1998 nyu ob 001 0 eng d
040 _aN$T
_beng
_epn
_cN$T
_dOCL
_dOCLCQ
_dTUU
_dOCLCQ
_dTNF
_dOCLCQ
_dN5L
_dE7B
_dIDEBK
_dOCLCQ
_dZCU
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCF
_dOCLCQ
_dNLGGC
_dYDXCP
_dOCLCQ
_dAZK
_dOCLCQ
_dMWM
_dCOCUF
_dAGLDB
_dMOR
_dPIFAG
_dOCLCQ
_dSAV
_dOCLCQ
_dQT7
_dU3W
_dLUE
_dSTF
_dWRM
_dOCLCQ
_dVTS
_dNRAMU
_dOCLCQ
_dINT
_dVT2
_dTOF
_dOCLCQ
_dWYU
_dTKN
_dOCLCQ
_dM8D
_dJZ6
019 _a533083192
_a647837036
_a660003633
_a748537462
_a814454665
_a819509961
_a821690741
_a961682236
_a962604111
020 _a0585245673
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a9780585245676
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a0195143981
020 _a9780195143980
020 _a9780195122305
_q(acid-free paper)
020 _a0195122305
_q(acid-free paper)
020 _a1280470836
020 _a9781280470837
020 _z0195122305
_q(acid-free paper)
024 8 _aebc272480
029 1 _aAU@
_b000051587819
029 1 _aDEBBG
_bBV043069064
029 1 _aDEBSZ
_b422536679
029 1 _aGBVCP
_b800731174
029 1 _aNZ1
_b15322940
035 _a(OCoLC)45733889
_z(OCoLC)533083192
_z(OCoLC)647837036
_z(OCoLC)660003633
_z(OCoLC)748537462
_z(OCoLC)814454665
_z(OCoLC)819509961
_z(OCoLC)821690741
_z(OCoLC)961682236
_z(OCoLC)962604111
050 4 _aQA8.4
_b.B345 1998eb
072 7 _aMAT
_x015000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aPBB
_2bicssc
082 0 4 _a510/.1
_221
049 _aMAIN
100 1 _aBalaguer, Mark.
245 1 0 _aPlatonism and anti-Platonism in mathematics /
_cMark Balaguer.
260 _aNew York :
_bOxford University Press,
_c1998.
300 _a1 online resource (x, 217 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 207-211) and index.
505 0 _aCover -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1. The Project of This Book -- 2. Mathematical Platonism and Anti-Platonism -- 3. Synopsis of the Book -- ONE: Platonism -- 2 The Epistemological Argument Against Platonism -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Formulating the Epistemological Argument -- 3. A Taxonomy of Platonist Responses -- 4. Contact with Other Worlds: G�odel -- 5. Contact in This World: Maddy -- 6. Knowledge Without Contact -- 3 A New Platonist Epistemology -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Skeleton of the Refutation of the Epistemological Argument -- 3. Internalist vs. Externalist Explanations -- 4. Defending and Motivating FBP -- 5. Consistency -- 4 Non-Uniqueness Embraced -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Trying to Salvage the Numbers -- 3. Structuralism -- 4. The Solution -- 5. Two Loose Ends -- TWO: Anti-Platonism -- 5 The Fregean Argument Against Anti-Platonism -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Argument -- 3. In Defense of Fictionalism -- 4. Nonfictionalistic Versions of Anti-Realistic Anti-Platonism -- 5. The Refutation of Realistic Anti-Platonism -- 6. Platonism and the Issue of Applicability and Indispensability -- 6 Denying the Existence of Indispensable Applications: Toward a Nominalization of Quantum Mechanics -- 1. Introduction -- 2. How Field Nominalizes -- 3. Malament's Objection -- 4. The Strategy for Nominalizing QM -- 5. The Nominalistic Status of Propensities -- 7 Accounting for Indispensable Applications from a Fictionalist Point of View -- 1. Introduction -- 2. What, Exactly, Needs to Be Accounted For? -- 3. A Fictionalist Account of the Applicability of Mathematics -- 4. Problems with Platonism Revisited -- THREE: Conclusions -- 8 The Unsolvability of the Problem and a Kinder, Gentler Positivism -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Strong Epistemic Conclusion -- 3. The Metaphysical Conclusion -- 4. My Official View -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W.
520 _aBalaguer demonstrates that there are no good arguments for or against mathematical platonism. He does this by establishing that both platonism and anti-platonism are defensible views. Introducing a form of platonism ("full-blooded platonism") that solves all problems traditionally associated with the view, he proceeds to defend anti-platonism (in particular, mathematical fictionalism) against various attacks, most notably the Quine-Putnam indispensability attack. He concludes by arguing that it is not simply that we do not currently have any good argument for or against platonism, but that we could never have such an argument and, indeed, that there is no fact of the matter as to whether platonism is correct.
588 0 _aPrint version record.
590 _aeBooks on EBSCOhost
_bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
650 0 _aMathematics
_xPhilosophy.
_0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85082153
650 0 _aPlatonists.
_0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85103327
650 7 _aMATHEMATICS
_xHistory & Philosophy.
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aMathematics
_xPhilosophy.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01012213
650 7 _aPlatonists.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01066881
650 1 7 _aWiskunde.
_2gtt
650 1 7 _aPlatonisme.
_2gtt
655 0 _aElectronic books.
655 4 _aElectronic books.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aBalaguer, Mark.
_tPlatonism and anti-Platonism in mathematics.
_dNew York : Oxford University Press, 1998
_z0195122305
_w(DLC) 97033108
_w(OCoLC)37580365
856 4 0 _uhttps://libproxy.firstcity.edu.my:8443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=23569
938 _aebrary
_bEBRY
_nebr10358396
938 _aEBSCOhost
_bEBSC
_n23569
938 _aProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection
_bIDEB
_n47083
938 _aYBP Library Services
_bYANK
_n3104733
938 _aYBP Library Services
_bYANK
_n7119207
994 _a92
_bMYFCU
999 _c39958
_d39958