TY - BOOK AU - Mayer,Robert TI - History and the early English novel: matters of fact from Bacon to Defoe T2 - Cambridge studies in eighteenth-century English literature and thought SN - 0585131090 AV - PR858.H5 M39 1997eb U1 - 823/.509358 20 PY - 1997/// CY - Cambridge [England] PB - Cambridge University Press KW - Defoe, Daniel, KW - Bacon, Francis, KW - English fiction KW - 18th century KW - History and criticism KW - Literature and history KW - Great Britain KW - History KW - Historical fiction, English KW - LITERARY CRITICISM KW - European KW - English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh KW - bisacsh KW - fast KW - Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) KW - Criticism, interpretation, etc KW - Electronic books N1 - Includes bibliographical references and index; 1. Baconian historiography: the contours of historical discourse in seventeenth-century England -- 2. "Idle Trash" or "Reliques of Something True"?: the fate of Brut and Arthur and the power of tradition -- 3. The History of Myddle: memory, history, and power -- 4. Lifewriting and historiography, fiction and fact: Baxter, Clarendon, and Hutchinson on the English Civil War -- 5. The secret history of the last Stuart kings -- 6. "Knowing strange things": historical discourse in the century before Robinson Crusoe -- 7. "History" before Defoe: Nashe, Deloney, Behn, Manley -- 8. Defoe's historical practice: from "The Ages Humbles Servant" to Major Alexander Ramkins -- 9. "Facts that are form'd to touch the mind": Defoe's narratives as forms of historical discourse -- 10. From history to the novel: the reception of Defoe N2 - "This new study of the origins of the English novel argues that the novel emerged from historical writing. Examining historical writers and forms frequently neglected by earlier scholars, Robert Mayer shows that in the seventeenth century historical discourse embraced not only "history" in its modern sense, but also fiction, polemic, gossip, and marvels. Mayer thus explains why Defoe's narratives were initially read as history. It is the acceptance of the claims to historicity, the study argues, that differentiates Defoes fictions from those of writers like Thomas Deloney and Aphra Behn, important writers who nevertheless have figured less prominently than Defoe in discussions of the novel. Mayer ends by exploring the theoretical implications of the history-fiction connection. His study makes an important contribution to the continuing debate about the emergence of what we now call the novel in Britain in the eighteenth century."--Jacket UR - https://libproxy.firstcity.edu.my:8443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=10220 ER -